Florida Tech 
W-L: ( 5- 9) PR = 90.3043
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
207 A Rollins Sunshine ( 9- 6, 91.0) 14-15
213 A Flagler Gulf South (15- 0, 99.9) 9-18
217 H Adelphi Northeast 10 ( 8- 4, 92.0) 13-12
221 A Embry-Riddle Sunshine (11- 2, 93.4) 10-19
226 A Regis (CO) Rocky Mountai (10- 4, 90.7) 13-14
228 A Colorado Mesa Rocky Mountai ( 4- 9, 87.5) 14-15
303 H Assumption Northeast 10 ( 2- 8, 84.2) 19- 4
307 H Lander Gulf South ( 6- 7, 88.4) 14-15
310 H Grand Valley State GLIAC ( 5- 7, 88.0) 12- 6
325 H Palm Beach Atlantic Sunshine ( 6- 7, 86.3) 19- 8
328 A Tampa Sunshine ( 8- 4, 95.1) 12-17
401 A St Leo Sunshine (12- 3, 95.0) 12-17
404 H Rollins Sunshine ( 9- 6, 91.0) 19-18
408 H Embry-Riddle Sunshine (11- 2, 93.4) 10-11
411 H Lynn Sunshine ( 9- 4, 94.0)
414 A Florida Southern Sunshine (12- 1, 96.3)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
207 A Rollins 14-15 -1 -1 0.10
213 A Flagler 9-18 -9 -10 0.00
217 H Adelphi 13-12 1 -1 + 2.27
221 A Embry-Riddle 10-19 -9 -4 -1.47
226 A Regis (CO) 13-14 -1 -1 -0.19
228 A Colorado Mesa 14-15 -1 2 - -3.42
303 H Assumption 19- 4 15 6 0.00
307 H Lander 14-15 -1 2 - -3.34
310 H Grand Valley State 12- 6 6 3 + 2.30
325 H Palm Beach Atlantic 19- 8 11 4 0.59
328 A Tampa 12-17 -5 -5 0.00
401 A St Leo 12-17 -5 -5 0.00
404 H Rollins 19-18 1 0 1.28
408 H Embry-Riddle 10-11 -1 -3 1.72
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
228 A Colorado Mesa 14-15 -1 2 - -3.42
307 H Lander 14-15 -1 2 - -3.34
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
217 H Adelphi 13-12 1 -1 + 2.27
310 H Grand Valley State 12- 6 6 3 + 2.30
|
Florida Tech Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Adelphi |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Alabama-Huntsville |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 3) |
Florida Tech |
| American International |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
| Anderson (SC) |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 3) |
Florida Tech |
| Ashland |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Florida Tech |
| Assumption |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Barton |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Belmont Abbey |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Bentley |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Bloomsburg |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Bridgeport |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Caldwell |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Catawba |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Charleston |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Chestnut Hill |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Chowan |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Coker |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Colorado Mesa |
Colorado Mesa |
Colorado Mesa |
 
| |
| Colorado-Colorado Spring |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Concordia-St Paul |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Converse |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| CSU-Pueblo |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| D'Youville |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Daemen |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Davenport |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Davis & Elkins |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| District of Columbia |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Dominican (CA) |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Dominican (NY) |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| East Stroudsburg |
East Stroudsburg |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
East Stroudsburg |
| Edinboro |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Embry-Riddle |
Embry-Riddle |
Embry-Riddle |
 
| |
| Emmanuel (GA) |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Emory & Henry |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Felician |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Findlay |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Flagler |
Flagler |
Flagler |
 
| |
| Florida Southern |
Florida Southern |
|
Florida Southern   5- 1 vs 0- 6 |
|
| Fort Lewis |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Franklin Pierce |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Frostburg State |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Gannon |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Georgian Court |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Grand Valley State |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Holy Family |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Indiana (PA) |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Indianapolis |
Indianapolis |
|
Indianapolis   3- 0 vs 1- 2 |
|
| Kutztown |
Kutztown |
|
 
| Kutztown |
| Lake Erie |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lander |
Lander |
Lander |
 
| |
| Lee |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) |
Florida Tech |
| Lees-McRae |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lenoir-Rhyne |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Lewis |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Limestone |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lincoln Memorial |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Lock Haven |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Lynn |
Lynn |
|
Lynn   5- 2 vs 3- 5 |
|
| Malone |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Mars Hill |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Maryville |
Maryville |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) |
Maryville |
| McKendree |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Mercy |
Mercy |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) |
Mercy |
| Millersville |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Missouri Western |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Molloy |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Montevallo |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 0- 4) |
Florida Tech |
| Mount Olive |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| New Haven |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Newberry |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| North Greenville |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Northern Michigan |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Northwood |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Pace |
Pace |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) |
Pace |
| Palm Beach Atlantic |
Florida Tech |
Florida Tech |
 
| |
| Post |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Quincy |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Regis (CO) |
Regis (CO) |
Regis (CO) |
 
| |
| Roberts Wesleyan |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Rockhurst |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Rollins |
Rollins |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 3) |
Rollins |
| Saginaw Valley State |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Seton Hill |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Florida Tech |
| Shepherd |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Shippensburg |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Shorter |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Slippery Rock |
Slippery Rock |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) |
Slippery Rock |
| Southern Connecticut |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Southern New Hampshire |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Southern Wesleyan |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| St Anselm |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   3- 1 vs 1- 2 |
|
| St Leo |
St Leo |
St Leo |
 
| |
| St Michaels |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) |
Florida Tech |
| St Thomas Aquinas |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Tampa |
Tampa |
Tampa |
 
| |
| Thomas Jefferson |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Thomas More |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Tiffin |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Tusculum |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Ursuline |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| UVA Wise |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Virginia State |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Walsh |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| West Chester |
West Chester |
|
tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) |
West Chester |
| West Virginia Wesleyan |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Westminster (UT) |
Florida Tech |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 2) |
Florida Tech |
| Wheeling |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| William Jewell |
Florida Tech |
|
tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) |
Florida Tech |
| Wilmington (DE) |
Florida Tech |
|
 
| Florida Tech |
| Wingate |
Wingate |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) |
Wingate |
| Young Harris |
Florida Tech |
|
Florida Tech   2- 2 vs 0- 3 |
|
PowerWise = 92

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 11.04
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Rollins ( 9- 6, 91.0) 14-15 -8.91 24.28 0.41 0.79 -6.70
0 A Flagler (15- 0, 99.9) 9-18 -0.00 33.19 0.41 0.79 -0.32
0 H Adelphi ( 8- 4, 92.0) 13-12 -7.92 25.27 -0.41 0.79 19.60
0 A Embry-Riddle (11- 2, 93.4) 10-19 -6.47 26.72 0.41 0.79 -4.78
0 A Regis (CO) (10- 4, 90.7) 13-14 -9.19 24.00 0.41 0.79 -6.93
0 A Colorado Mesa ( 4- 9, 87.5) 14-15 -12.42 20.77 0.41 0.79 -9.47
0 H Assumption ( 2- 8, 84.2) 19- 4 -15.66 17.53 -0.41 0.79 13.50
0 H Lander ( 6- 7, 88.4) 14-15 -11.53 21.66 -0.41 0.79 -9.41
0 H Grand Valley S ( 5- 7, 88.0) 12- 6 -11.89 21.30 -0.41 0.79 16.47
0 H Palm Beach Atl ( 6- 7, 86.3) 19- 8 -13.60 19.59 -0.41 0.79 15.12
0 A Tampa ( 8- 4, 95.1) 12-17 -4.81 28.38 0.41 0.79 -3.47
0 A St Leo (12- 3, 95.0) 12-17 -4.95 28.24 0.41 0.79 -3.58
0 H Rollins ( 9- 6, 91.0) 19-18 -8.91 24.28 -0.41 0.79 18.82
0 H Embry-Riddle (11- 2, 93.4) 10-11 -6.47 26.72 -0.41 0.79 -5.42
------
33.43
|
winning pts = 83.5099 losing points = -50.0822
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------